affaan-m/ECC, tested in 4 task classes

Skills from affaan-m/ECC were tested in 4 kinds of task. Results are given one kind of task at a time, and never added up into one number for the repository.

Across the classes it was tested in

How many task classes each result fell in. Counts of classes, not scores.
What happenedClassesWhich
Helped clearly1Voice
Helped on some1Spec writing (paired)
No reliable difference3Accessibility audit, Spec writing (deterministic), On-page audit

We do not add these together. A skill-authoring score is a share of requirements met. A voice score is how often a blind reader preferred it. They are different measurements of different things, so a single number over both would be a figure neither test produced. The numbers are on the skill pages, where each was measured.

Per model

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5: classes by result.
What happenedClassesWhich
Helped clearly2Spec writing (paired), Voice
Helped a little, under our bar1Accessibility audit
No reliable difference2Spec writing (deterministic), On-page audit

GPT-5 mini

GPT-5 mini: classes by result.
What happenedClassesWhich
Helped clearly1Voice
No reliable difference4Accessibility audit, Spec writing (deterministic), Spec writing (paired), On-page audit

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: classes by result.
What happenedClassesWhich
Helped clearly2Spec writing (paired), Voice
No reliable difference3Accessibility audit, Spec writing (deterministic), On-page audit

Each model is named by the string the vendor actually served, not by the one the run requested.

Coverage, class by class

What was done in each class for this repository. The full grid is on the coverage page.
ClassStateWhat that means
Skill authoringNo qualifying skillWe looked through this repository for this kind of task and found nothing that met the bar we publish.
Accessibility auditTestedWe ran this one. The same tasks were done with the skill loaded and again without it, and the numbers are on that skill's own page.
Spec writingTestedWe ran this one. The same tasks were done with the skill loaded and again without it, and the numbers are on that skill's own page.
On-page auditTestedWe ran this one. The same tasks were done with the skill loaded and again without it, and the numbers are on that skill's own page.
VoiceTestedWe ran this one. The same tasks were done with the skill loaded and again without it, and the numbers are on that skill's own page.
Code reviewNo qualifying skillWe looked through this repository for this kind of task and found nothing that met the bar we publish.
Test writingDeclared emptyWe said in advance that we would leave this square empty, so nothing here has been weighed against the bar.

Identity pins

Every skill from this repository that holds a slot, and the commit its arm was given.
ClassPathCommitContent hashDate tested
Accessibility auditskills/accessibilityd8409a4b0813ab86a50717d62026-08-30
Spec writingskills/product-capabilityd8409a4b08133e00528029692026-08-30
On-page auditskills/seod8409a4b08139a655a52cfd92026-08-30
Voiceskills/brand-voiced8409a4b0813eae455eed7662026-08-30

Licence status, per pin

What the licence check found beside each set of pinned bytes, run against that pin's own commit.
Pinned bytesLicenceLicence fileChecked at
skills/accessibility slotNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/product-capability slotNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/seo slotNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/brand-voice slotNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/skill-scout rejectedNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/skill-comply rejectedNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/click-path-audit rejectedNot recordednoneNot recorded
skills/product-lens rejectedNot recordednoneNot recorded

We record the licence for each file we tested, not for the whole repository. Some repositories have no licence at the top and license each skill folder on its own, and one of the files here has no licence at all. Each row is a check against that file's own commit. A row reading not recorded means we have not run the check on those bytes yet. A row reading no licence file means we ran it and found none. Nothing here is guessed from a repository name.

Everything on this page is worked out at build time from the runs we committed. We publish only the file we tested and where it came from. No description, no README, no star count, no install line.